When you reply to an email, the majority of the time it reaches the recipient without a problem, but sometimes the email client in this case Google will seem to reject the message with the status of blocked - this can be a little confusing because you’ve replied to the previous email and that was absolutely fine no error?
Note : This is not a problem with gmail as any email platform set up for strict enforcement should perform the same actions, if you notice this is not being performed on other email platforms you might not have your security correct!
Usually, when replying to an email, the first message goes through without issue, but future replies in the same thread fail to be delivered. Gmail may show a permanent error, as if the recipient has blocked the message. At first glance, it might seem like a problem with your account—but the real issue often lies in how the recipient handles encrypted emails. Let’s explore why this happens.
Why Gmail Replies Fail When Responding to Gateway-Encrypted Emails
When replying to certain encrypted emails, you might encounter a frustrating issue: your first reply goes through successfully, but subsequent replies in the same thread bounce back with delivery failure errors. This isn't a problem with your Gmail account—it's caused by incompatibilities between Gmail and enterprise encryption gateways.
Understanding the Issue
Many organizations use encryption gateway solutions (like Zix, Voltage SecureMail, Proofpoint Encryption, or similar systems) rather than standard encryption protocols like S/MIME or PGP. These gateways create temporary encryption sessions or use token-based systems to secure email communications.
Why the First Reply Works
When you initially reply to a gateway-encrypted email:
- Gmail signs your message with its DKIM signature for authentication
- The recipient's encryption gateway still has an active session or valid token for that conversation
- The gateway can properly decrypt and process your reply
- The message is delivered successfully
Why Subsequent Replies Fail
Problems arise when:
- Session expiration: The encryption gateway's session for that conversation expires (often after 24-72 hours)
- Token invalidation: The unique encryption token associated with the thread becomes invalid
- Context loss: The gateway loses the encryption context needed to process replies to that specific thread
When you try to reply after these conditions occur, the recipient's gateway server rejects your message because:
- It can't associate your reply with a valid encryption session
- The encryption metadata in the email headers no longer matches what the gateway expects
- The gateway treats your reply as an improperly formatted encrypted message
Gmail then returns a bounce message, typically with error codes like:
550 5.7.1 Message rejected due to security policies554 5.7.5 Permanent error evaluating policy- Similar permanent delivery failure errors
Identifying Gateway Encryption
You can check if encryption gateways are involved by examining the email headers of messages you've received. Look for:
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; [encrypted-token]@domain.com
X-[Vendor]-Encrypted: true
X-Voltage-Encrypted: true
X-Zix-Encrypted: true
Or references to encryption appliances and gateways in the Received: headers.
Why New Emails Work
Starting a fresh email thread avoids this problem because:
- No expired session or invalid token is referenced
- The gateway treats it as a new conversation requiring fresh encryption
- A new encryption session is established if needed
What are my options?
Start a new email thread - The simplest solution is to compose a new email rather than replying to the problematic thread
Reply quickly - If you must use reply, do so while the encryption session is still active (typically within 24-48 hours)
Technical Note
This issue is specific to proprietary encryption gateways and doesn't typically occur with:
- Standard S/MIME encryption (where both parties have valid certificates)
- PGP/GPG encryption
- TLS transport encryption
- Regular email communications
The incompatibility arises because these gateway systems weren't designed with modern webmail providers' reply mechanisms in mind, creating a mismatch in how thread encryption is handled.
Conclusion
While email encryption gateways provide important security benefits for organizations, they can create compatibility issues with standard email clients like Gmail. Understanding that the problem lies in expired encryption sessions—not email delivery issues—helps you work around these limitations effectively. When in doubt, starting a fresh email thread is the most reliable solution.